 |
From the Archives:
THE PERILS AND PROFITS OF MIXING GENRES:
THE WORK OF ROBERT R. McCAMMON
by Matt Adler
|
 |
Editor's note:
This article originally appeared in the book
How to Write Horror and Get It Published, edited by Marc A.
Cerasini, and published by Romantic Times, Inc., October 31, 1989.
It is reprinted here with permission of
Romantic Times BOOKclub
(www.rtbookclub.com).
Robert McCammon ("Rick" to his many friends and
acquaintances) is gracious, soft-spoken and genteel—the perfect
Southern gentleman. Not at all the image that might immediately
come to mind about the author of such highly acclaimed horror
novels as Swan Song, Usher's Passing, They Thirst,
and Blue World.
But Mr. McCammon has in recent years carved a niche for himself in
the highly competitive world of horror fiction.
Robert McCammon broke onto the horror scene in 1978 with his
first novel, Baal. That was immediately followed by what
McCammon refers to as his "breakthrough novel," Bethany's Sin.
"I was living with my grandparents and doing advertising copy for
a department store. A dead end, soul-destroying job. I had attended
the University of Alabama, majoring in journalism, but there were no
jobs in my field."
McCammon was born in Birmingham, Alabama, in the mid-1950s,
and his post-college homecoming (and living with his grandparents)
was less than he expected. He turned to writing as a creative outlet.
He also admits to have been "impressed with Stephen King's work.
Perhaps even inspired by it." His hobby paid off.
"I did quit my job after Bethany's Sin, to write full-time." And write
he did. After Bethany's Sin he wrote The Night Boat and a full-blown
modern vampire novel, They Thirst. Following the success of those
two novels, Robert McCammon moved on to the "big leagues"—the
hardcover market. Two novels followed, both published by Henry
Holt: Mystery Walk (1983) and Usher's Passing (1984), an
imaginative and original sequel to Edgar Allan Poe's "The Fall of the
House of Usher."
Though hardcover publication was soothing to his writer's ego,
McCammon found that it was no guarantee of success. Holt did not
promote these novels at all and, though beautiful works, they
languished and died in hardcover. It was then that McCammon
discovered something about himself that many authors learn sooner
or later.
"I realized that I was more concerned that my books be read than by
the form in which they come out. That's why I am very happy at
Pocket. They have given my books wide publication and they helped
me find a whole new audience."
Indeed they did. When Pocket decided to gamble on Robert
McCammon, both they, and he, did it in a big way. Swan Song (1985)
was the major hit of McCammon's career—a successful novel that
propelled him onto the bestseller lists. Swan Song is an apocalyptic
novel about a horrible nuclear war and the evil that stalks the postwar
landscape. This novel had a huge cast of characters from all walks of
life, from presidents to paupers. These common, all-American types
people McCammon's early works, but are never handled better than
in Swan Song.
Another of the reasons for the success of Swan Song may be that
with it, McCammon finally solidified his hold on his writing "voice"
and his personal vision which was to come to infuse all of his
subsequent work.
"I guess you could say my stories are about what characters do
when faced with 'The Wall.' When an individual comes face to face
with the crisis of their life—The Wall—they either go up or down.
Many of my characters become bigger than they were, they grow.
"I try to offer my readers something more than mere entertainment.
I give them a positive experience, a sort of reward for all the horror
and unpleasantness that they had to read through to get to the end. I
want the reader to feel good about himself when he closes the book, I
want the audience to have learned something, or felt something."
This humanistic approach to horror writing came to fruition with
the character of Sister in Swan Song. "Here she was," remarks the
author, "a bag lady, as low as she could possibly fall—but in essence
she ends up saving the world!" Sister did indeed become "bigger" than
she was before—no one is beyond redemption in the fiction of Robert
McCammon.
Bestseller success was not a smooth road for Rick, despite the
financial rewards and independence that came with high sales and a
name that suddenly spells success. One thing he had to live with were
the inevitable pitfalls of writing horror in The Age of Stephen King.
McCammon feels that King's influence, which still dominates all
horror fiction, is a double-edged sword.
"On the one hand, Mr. King really opened up the horror genre in
this country, and that's good. But King's presence is so
overshadowing today that anyone writing horror fiction is
automatically compared to him.
"I admit that I was consciously influenced by King's work with my
first few novels—and being compared to Stephen King is flattering,
but sometimes the comparison just isn't valid."
Comparison to King is just one of the many barriers to be overcome
when attempting a career in horror fiction, but it is one that can even
carry over to individual works as well. Nor is this sort of comparison
the sole domain of horror critics and reviewers.
"I remember when I was writing Swan Song, I told an acquaintance
about the story, saying that it was about a nuclear holocaust and what
happens to the survivors. That person's first remark was, 'Oh, like The
Stand.' I thought to myself, 'Hey, wait a minute, there was no nuclear
holocaust in The Stand ! Contrary to popular belief, Stephen King did
not invent the apocalyptic novel."
About that all-purpose, generic item generally referred to as "the
horror novel," McCammon reflects that being labeled a "horror
author" is actually "more of a marketing ploy than a rule of literature.
I think of myself as a cross-over author. To me, the story is more
important than any sort of classification a publisher can put on it. I
like to mix and mingle genre conventions, rather than stick to the tried
and true, more traditional forms."
This preference for the unusual mixture of genres is evident in Rick
McCammon's next two works. Stinger (1988) a conventional science
fiction/horror tale in the mode of a 1950s potboiler, but with many
unique characterizations and twists in the plot that would spin the
head of even a Rod Serling. It tells the story of two alien races who
use a tiny Texas town as an intergalactic battleground in a struggle
that will decide the fate of a thousand worlds. The American gothic
setting of the post oak desert country of central Texas was chosen by
McCammon because of its "harsh, empty environment," and in his
hands such a wide open country actually becomes "claustrophobic."
As McCammon sees it, "there is simply nothing (in the desert) for
individuals to react to—nothing but other people. The climate is
uncompromising and harsh—even dangerous. There is no forest, no
mountain, there is nothing to hide behind, therefore the characters
must face themselves. They have to grow, or perish." Into the heady
brew that was Stinger, McCammon threw in rival motorcycle gangs
(white and hispanic), a crooked sheriff, a sleazy used car salesman, a
gentle alien creature inhabiting the body of a little girl—and a couple
of monsters from outer space. This bunch of human malcontents had
to learn to work together to survive a threat that was bigger than all
of their petty squabbles.
Horror as prophecy, perhaps? Or is it horror as social commentary?
Mixing and matching genres for (hoped for) crossover success was
the formula Rick McCammon again turned to with The Wolf's Hour
(1989). This werewolf fantasy features a dashing James Bond-like
protagonist named Michael Gallatin. Gallatin is a top-notch spy with
the British secret service during the dark days of the Second World
War, but only his immediate superior knows Gallatin's secret—that
this agent can, at will, transform himself into a wolf.
The Wolf's Hour has all the romantic suspense and beautiful femme
fatales one would come to expect from a spy thriller, but the added
dash of horror (lycanthropy) makes a big difference. McCammon
had juggled three separate genres and come up with a winner!
The Wolf's Hour was a success, and the author found it personally
successful in one surprising way. "You know you've made it as a
writer when this happens. On the cover of The Wolf's Hour, my name
is actually above the title! That's the very first time that has ever
happened."
Research is invaluable when attempting anything that resembles a
historical novel, and Rick admits to doing his share for this novel.
"I've always been a World War II buff, and doing research for The
Wolf's Hour was sheer pleasure. I can honestly say writing it was the
most fun I've ever had as a novelist." But the author didn't only juggle
the genres, he transformed them as easily as his protagonist turns into
a wolf.
"Most werewolf novels portray the lycanthrope as a beast of
destruction. There's nothing wrong with this approach, but it wasn't
what I wanted to do with the concept. I have read some of the other
werewolf novels...Guy Endore's The Werewolf of Paris and Gary
Brandner's The Howling to name only two. I enjoyed these books, but
they didn't answer the questions I had posed to myself.
"How does a man become a werewolf? How does a werewolf live?
How could a werewolf struggle against his animal self to become a
positive force, not a negative one?
"I created Michael Gallatin to answer these questions."
McCammon's werewolf is portrayed as a noble warrior in the
struggle against Nazism. The protagonist was a self-divided creature,
a sympathetic and complex anti-hero who was darkly compelling
despite his danger, and the whiff of tragedy about him—the perfect
romantic hero of the Byronic mode. A kind of modern Dracula. The
device of portraying the monster as a tragic anti-hero has been used
in vampire fiction since Bram Stoker's classic was set to paper, but
never before has this been tried with a lycanthrope. McCammon, with
The Wolf's Hour, attempted to cover new and untrodden
psychological ground.
"Making the werewolf into a romantic lead took a lot of thinking. I
wanted to show the creature as a doomed anti-hero, struggling with a
beast within. I thought about it a long time before I started writing."
To shore up the story and make the illusion more powerful and
effective, Rick McCammon wisely utilized a series of believable and
fascinating "facts" about werewolves.
"For instance," the author tells us, "as a wolf, Michael Gallatin ages
as a wolf—so the longer he remains in bestial form, the faster he ages.
Another werewolf in the novel suffers and dies from a bad case of
worms, contracted from eating contaminated meat." Such touches
add credibility and are invaluable tools to reinforce the logic within
the work of fiction.
According to McCammon, the horror genre has remained
fundamentally the same for generations. "First, you've got to have a
story. Then you can throw in the kinks, change the direction a little,
make it new and interesting. But you must start with the story." And,
he adds, "Don't worry about how your work is classified."
McCammon acknowledges that each individual writer must go
about writing his or her own way. For him, what works best is
thinking ahead.
"I usually think three books ahead, mentally. I let the ideas simmer
and boil, and when I finally sit down to write it, I find it comes much
easier. I no longer use an outline. I do chart the 'signpost scenes' to
help me keep the plot on track, but I find it is much more fun to write
without a solid outline.
"I find that when I do an outline, it takes some of the surprise and
joy of writing away from me, and I know that can affect my work
and the enjoyment of my readers as well. As clichéd as it sounds,
characters do take on a life of their own, and some characters are
quite strong—they would defy any outline I have set down for them
anyway."
Look for McCammon's Blue World (1989), a collection of short
stories, and his 1990 release The Address—about a house in
Hollywood and what goes on there between the years 1919 and 1991.
"I researched the founding of Hollywood, how it came to be the
movie capital of the world, and the silent movie era during which
much of the story is set. This novel is unlike anything I'd ever
done—and that's just the way I like it. I just don't like to do the same
thing twice."
About his craft, Rick McCammon admits that despite the hard work
"the best thing about my career is that it solves any problems I may
have with boredom. I get to create a whole new world every nine
months or so—a whole world filled with new people, people I created
myself. There is nothing like that feeling."
|